<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fort Walton Beach Tea Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fwbteaparty.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fwbteaparty.com</link>
	<description>Citizen action for a more fiscally responsible and accountable nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:56:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Florida Victory Against the EPA</title>
		<link>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/04/a-florida-victory-against-the-epa/</link>
		<comments>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/04/a-florida-victory-against-the-epa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Saccomanno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fwbteaparty.com/?p=985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick background – back in 2009 the EPA demanded Florida, and Florida only, comply with bizarre and onerous water quality regulations that would have raised our water bills by at least four fold. We organized a statewide appearance at EPA hearings and shoved them backwards. This issue did not go away…but yesterday the EPA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick background – back in 2009 the EPA demanded Florida, and Florida only, comply with bizarre and onerous water quality regulations that would have raised our water bills by at least four fold. We organized a statewide appearance at EPA hearings and shoved them backwards. This issue did not go away…but yesterday the EPA is backing down from the ruling.</p>
<p>This is a great example of what happens when the Tea Party movement teams up with County and City government to fight regulations that make no sense. We provided a loud voice for the public to demand that our elected officials stand up to the EPA, and boy did they!!!!</p>
<p>We can make a difference!!!!</p>
<p>Note the quote by the Earthjustice folks at the bottom:<a href="http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/dcblog/2011/11/enviros_state_officials_still.html" target="_blank"> http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/dcblog/2011/11/enviros_state_officials_still.html</a></p>
<p>Details:</p>
<p>To summarize it, it states EPA preliminarily approves DEP’s draft of a numeric nutrient rule. If the Florida Department of Environmental Protection adopts satisfactory nutrient rule standards, EPA will withdrawal the rule it has adopted. The EPA rule in question is the one we have filed our legal challenges against. I believe this means EPA is seeking a graceful way to back away from its numeric nutrient rule. After EPA adopted it, the storm of controversy it generated has been overwhelming. Now that DEP is in the picture of creating its own rule, this gives EPA a convenient way to withdrawal their rule. The EPA rule was originally justified on a finding by an EPA Administrator that Florida wasn’t doing the job and it was necessary for EPA to step in and do it its self.</p>
<p>Now that EPA has preliminarily found Florida’s initial draft to be satisfactory, it is my belief they have begun the process of backing away from the rule and getting out of this controversy. There is a very good chance EPA will never actually implement or enforce its rule, as long as DEP appears to be making progress on its own rule. I will keep you posted as this develops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/04/a-florida-victory-against-the-epa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Federal Real ID Act in Florida</title>
		<link>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/04/the-federal-real-id-act-in-florida/</link>
		<comments>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/04/the-federal-real-id-act-in-florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Saccomanno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fwbteaparty.com/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In September 2001, we were attacked by a group of 19 Middle Eastern males. This group had driver’s licenses in several states, including Florida, using improper addresses. None were obtained in false identities. Of the 19, 16 were here legally. The 9/11 Commission recommended changes to how state driver’s licenses (the term ID card also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">In September 2001, we were attacked by a group of 19 Middle Eastern males. This group had driver’s licenses in several states, including Florida, using improper addresses. None were obtained in false identities. Of the 19, 16 were here legally. The 9/11 Commission recommended changes to how state driver’s licenses (the term ID card also applies but for brevity I will lump both together) were issued.</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">In February 2005, Wisconsin Rep. James Sensenbrenner sponsored the REAL ID Act, HR 418, in the U.S. House. While it passed an initial vote, it was never enacted. A few weeks later, he added the REAL ID Act as an amendment to a defense authorization and Tsunami relief bill, HR 1268. Despite this federal function not being authorized under the Constitution’s Article 1 Section 8, and as such being a violation of the Constitution’s 10<sup>th</sup> Amendment, this bill easily passed the House and Senate with no debate on REAL ID and was signed into law by Pres. Bush on May 11, 2005. The bill dictated to the states how they were to issue their driver’s licenses, to include keeping electronic or paper copies of citizen’s personal documents and a requirement for a residential address from all people, to include those such as police officers and domestic violence victims whose addresses were protected by state law. The concept was the person had to prove to the government who they were via these documents, even though there was no suspicion they were someone else, and there was never a warrant issued for the seizure of their papers as required by the 4<sup>th</sup> Amendment. There was no “opt-out”, and if a state did not comply, they were required to change how they issued their license to have it say it was not valid as “<span style="text-decoration: underline;">federal identification</span>”- the Act says this using those two words, so it is a federal identification. The initial deadline for state compliance was 2008. The purposes stated in the federal act were four:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">1)      Entry into federal buildings</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">2)      Flight on federally-regulated commercial aircraft</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">3)      Entry into nuclear power plants, and</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">4)      Any purpose as determined by the DHS Secretary.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The last one was omitted by Mr. Brian Zimmer, the staff member that claimed responsibility for writing the 2005 law when he spoke about it to the Florida Legislature in February 2011, and again by Mr. Sensenbrenner when he publicly discussed REAL ID in August 2011 at the Heritage Foundation.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The law was adopted in Florida in 2008 as part of Omnibus bill CS/SB 1992. It was 4 of 47 sections that changed our driver’s license law in Chapter 322. The law too effect on January 1, 2010, and resulted in huge backlogs due to citizens not having their papers in order. According to Steven Fielder of the DHSMV, Florida has spent over $10 million on REAL ID since 2008, with almost $3 million of that as unreimbursed state tax dollars. During this time, not one terrorist or illegal alien has been identified due solely to REAL ID.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">In the intervening months, the Florida DHSMV deviated from the law by reducing the paperwork requirements for those born before 1935- many of these people never had a birth certificate, and thus could not renew their license they had here for decades. There were no sanctions for this common-sense deviation.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The law has significant parallels to the Brady Act of the 1990’s. In that Act, the federal government attempted to utilize local law enforcement to perform a federal function (background checks for firearm purchases). Two Sheriffs sued, and the Supreme Court held it was a violation of the 10th Amendment for the federal government to draft into federal service the local officers due to the dual sovereignty of the federal and state governments. The tie-in to REAL ID is that the federal government is attempting to draft the licensing functions of the several states to make a “federal identification”. This is likewise a violation of the 10<sup>th</sup> Amendment. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">As the states looked at what REAL ID was going to do to them, many passed laws to prohibit or restrict the law. As of October 2011, 19 states have done so, with the legislation coming nearly equally from Democrats and Republicans. Only 9 have passed it. Of these 9, Utah and Michigan have since reversed their position and passed legislation or a resolution against REAL ID. The federal government pushed back the deadline from 2008 to 2011, and then from 2011 to 2013. In the meantime, two bills were filed in first the 110<sup>th</sup> (Republican, HR 4160) and then the 111<sup>th</sup> (Democrat, HR 140) Congress to cut “federal” funding to non-compliant states. Each of these died in committee. In the 112<sup>th</sup>, HR 3082 cut $16 million from REAL ID’s central hub funding.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The purposes of the law as have been articulated by the Florida sponsor, Sen. Cary Baker as well as Mr. Sensenbrenner respectively were to keep illegal aliens from getting a license, and to prevent terrorism (Mr. Sensenbrenner has also listed some things such as those with suspended licenses in one state not being able to go to another state, but there were already laws on the books here for that- F.S. 322.30). Both of these, while laudable, are not an effect of REAL ID. As to illegal aliens, they have driven in Florida w/o a license for decades and continue to do so. As to terrorists, of the original 19, 16 of them would heave been eligible for a REAL ID since they were here legally. The Heritage Foundation studied 39 failed terror plots since September 2001 and of these, none involved REAL ID in any way shape or form. The plots were foiled by good lawful police work coupled with intelligence. Many of the suspects in these plots were eligible for a REAL ID.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">In summary, REAL ID:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">1)      Was passed in violation of the 10<sup>th</sup> Amendment since Congress cannot tell the states how to issue their driver’s licenses- a power reserved to the states.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">2)      Endangers the citizens of Florida by placing all documents in a central location, and making public the residential addresses of police officers and domestic violence victims, both of which used to be protected by state law.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">3)      Improperly required the seizure of personal papers in violation of the 4<sup>th</sup> Amendment.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">4)      Did not allow for states to “opt-out”.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">5)      Is a federal identification card.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">6)      Gives the DHS Secretary unlimited power as to the required use of a REAL ID.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">7)      Has cost the Florida taxpayer about $3 million, or over $10 million when the “federal” money is counted.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">8)      Has already been deviated from by the Florida DHSMV.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">9)      Is not supported by federal case law.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">10)  Has been legislated FOR in 9 states, 2 of which have subsequently reversed their position.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">11)  Has been legislated AGAINST in 19 states by both Democrats and Republicans. None of these states have been penalized in any way by the federal government. Two attempts to do so in Congress have failed.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">12)  Is being defunded by the current Congress.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">13)  Would not have prevented the 9/11 attacks, and has not prevented any subsequent plots.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">14)  Has not identified one illegal alien or terrorist.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">15)  Has created a tremendous and unnecessary hardship for many citizens in Florida.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">The solution is HB 109 / S 220, the Florida Driver’s License <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Citizen</span> Protection Act, which addresses the Constitutional and citizen-protection issues identified above. It does not change how aliens are processed. It is currently in the House Transportation &amp; Highway Safety Subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Brad Drake, and needs to be heard so it can move to the next subcommittee.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Paul Henry</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Floridians Against REAL ID, a non-partisan and non-profit citizen’s group</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.liberty2010.org/realid"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Times New Roman;">www.liberty2010.org/realid</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="mailto:realid@liberty2010.org"><span style="color: #0000ff; font-family: Times New Roman;">realid@liberty2010.org</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">850-629-9550</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/04/the-federal-real-id-act-in-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Registration Open for Candidate Education Program</title>
		<link>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/03/registration-open-for-candidate-education-program/</link>
		<comments>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/03/registration-open-for-candidate-education-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 04:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Saccomanno</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fwbteaparty.com/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Registration Open for Candidate Education Program Offered by Supervisor of Elections Office November 3, 2011 &#8211; The Okaloosa County Supervisor of Elections Office is offering Candidate University in a condensed format. The program is for those seeking to run for public office or any member of the public interested in learning about the process. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Registration Open for Candidate Education Program<br />
Offered by Supervisor of Elections Office</p>
<p>November 3, 2011 &#8211; The Okaloosa County Supervisor of Elections Office is offering Candidate University in a condensed format. The program is for those seeking to run for public office or any member of the public interested in learning about the process. It is designed to educate interested persons of the appropriate procedures and documents required to run for office in Okaloosa County.</p>
<p>Candidate University normally consists of a three-hour curriculum focused on the fundamentals of becoming and being a candidate. The upcoming crash course version is formatted for 90 minutes. Participants will be introduced to each step involved in the process including pre-filing, collecting petitions and qualifying. Campaign pitfalls will also be discussed. All participants will receive a certificate upon completion of the program.</p>
<p>The dates in which the sessions will be held are listed below:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Fort Walton Beach                                 Monday, November 14<br />
Water &amp; Sewer Building, 3rd Floor, BCC Board Room<br />
1804 Lewis Turner Blvd.<br />
11:30am-1:00pm<br />
Crestview                                                 Tuesday, November 15<br />
Newman C. &#8220;Buddy&#8221; Brackin Building<br />
(formerly the First National Bank)<br />
3rd Floor Conference Room<br />
302 Wilson Street North<br />
5:30pm-7:00pm<br />
To register, contact Tiffany C. Rivera at 689-5600 or via email at <a href="mailto:trivera@co.okaloosa.fl.us&lt;mailto:trivera@co.okaloosa.fl.us">trivera@co.okaloosa.fl.us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fwbteaparty.com/2011/11/03/registration-open-for-candidate-education-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.143 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-05 10:55:14 -->

